The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills (BIS) announced yesterday (26 May) that Professor Timothy Richard Dafforn will become the department’s Chief Scientific Adviser on 1 June.
He will succeed Professor John Perkins CBE in the role, which aims to ensure that the BIS’s policies, operations, and contributions to wider government issues are underpinned by ‘fit-for-purpose science, technology and engineering advice’.
Dafforn currently holds the positions of Entrepreneur in Residence for Synthetic Biology at BIS, and is Director of Knowledge Transfer, Life and Environmental Sciences at the University of Birmingham. He is also Head of Policy, a trustee and executive member of the Biochemical Society.
To date, Dafforn has authored over 100 publications and secured £10 million in lifetime research grants.
The part-time role will see Dafforn work for three days at BIS and for the remaining two days of the working week at his Birmingham post. This arrangement aims to ‘encourage the sharing of the latest thinking and learning in science and engineering’.
BIS Permanent Secretary Martin Donnelly welcomed the “depth of knowledge and experience” Dafforn could bring to the position, and thanked Professor Perkins for “all his work over the past three years – in particular his highly successful Review of Engineering Skills”.
Government Chief Scientific Adviser Sir Mark Walport added that he was “pleased to welcome Professor Dafforn to the cross-government network of Chief Scientific Advisers”, and would “look forward to working with him to ensure that the UK continues to lead the way in the use of science and engineering evidence by government”.
Find out more about BIS.
Get our weekly digest
resource.co article ai
How will the government and DMOs address the challenges of including glass in DRS while ensuring a level playing field across the UK?
There's no easy solution to include glass in the DRS while maintaining a level playing field. Potential approaches include a phased introduction of glass, potentially with higher deposits to reflect its logistical challenges. The government and DMOs could incentivise innovation in glass packaging design and subsidise dedicated return points for glass-handling. Exemptions for smaller businesses unable to handle glass might also be necessary. Any successful solution will likely blend several approaches. It must address the differing priorities of devolved administrations, balance environmental benefits with logistical and cost implications, and be supported by robust consumer education campaigns emphasizing the importance of glass recycling.