As the UK implements sweeping Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) reforms in 2024, businesses are being forced to rethink their entire approach to packaging. The changes, which shift financial responsibility for packaging waste from local councils to producers, are already driving innovation in recyclable materials and closed-loop systems.

The UK's packaging industry is undergoing its most significant transformation in decades, driven by new Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) regulations that came into effect in 2024. Under these reforms, companies that produce or import packaging must now pay the full net cost of managing their packaging waste, fundamentally changing the economics of the circular economy.
The EPR Revolution
Extended Producer Responsibility represents a paradigm shift in how the UK manages packaging waste. Previously, local councils bore the brunt of collection and recycling costs, creating misaligned incentives. Now, producers pay fees based on the recyclability of their packaging, creating direct financial motivation to design for circularity.
"This is the biggest change to waste management in the UK since the introduction of kerbside recycling," says Sarah Mitchell, Director of Circular Economy at the Resource Association. "For the first time, the cost of end-of-life management is built into business decisions from day one."
Key Changes Under EPR
Industry Response and Innovation
Major retailers and manufacturers are responding with significant investments in packaging redesign. Supermarket giant Tesco has committed to making all its own-brand packaging recyclable, reusable, or compostable by 2025, while Unilever is piloting refill stations across the UK to eliminate single-use plastic bottles entirely.
Modern automated recycling facilities are becoming essential infrastructure for the circular economy
Photo: Recycling Technologies Ltd
The economics have completely changed. Designing for recyclability is no longer just good PR – it's fundamental to our bottom line.
Material Innovation
The push toward circularity is accelerating innovation in packaging materials. Companies are investing heavily in:
The Deposit Return Scheme
Complementing EPR reforms, the UK government plans to introduce a Deposit Return Scheme (DRS) for drinks containers in 2025. Under the scheme, consumers will pay a small deposit on bottles and cans, refunded when they return them for recycling.
Scotland is leading the way, with its DRS scheduled to launch ahead of the rest of the UK. The Scottish scheme will cover PET plastic bottles, metal cans, and glass bottles, with a proposed deposit of 20p per container.
| Material Type | Current Rate (2023) | 2030 Target |
|---|---|---|
| Plastic packaging | 44% | 73% |
| Metal packaging | 79% | 85% |
| Glass packaging | 76% | 85% |
| Paper/card packaging | 79% | 85% |
Challenges and Concerns
Despite broad support for the principles of EPR and DRS, implementation challenges remain. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have raised concerns about the administrative burden of compliance, while some retail groups warn that DRS could create operational difficulties.
The British Retail Consortium has called for greater harmonization between the four UK nations, noting that different implementation timelines and requirements in England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland create complexity for businesses operating across borders.
Infrastructure Gaps
Environmental groups point out that regulatory ambition must be matched by investment in collection and processing infrastructure. The UK currently lacks sufficient capacity to recycle all the material that new regulations will capture, particularly for flexible plastics and composite materials.
"We're setting ambitious targets, which is positive, but we need immediate investment in sorting and reprocessing facilities," warns James Crawford, Head of Resources at Green Alliance. "Without that infrastructure, we risk creating a bottleneck where material is collected but has nowhere to go."
Video: Inside a state-of-the-art packaging recycling facility
Looking Ahead
As the UK's circular economy framework takes shape, attention is turning to enforcement and effectiveness. The Environment Agency will play a key role in ensuring compliance, with significant penalties for businesses that fail to meet their obligations.
For consumers, the changes should bring clearer labelling and more consistent recycling collection. OPRL (On-Pack Recycling Label) requirements will standardize packaging information, making it easier to know what goes in which bin.
The Bigger Picture
The UK's packaging reforms are part of a broader Resources and Waste Strategy aimed at doubling resource productivity and eliminating avoidable plastic waste by 2042. Success will require continued collaboration between government, industry, and citizens.
"This is just the beginning," says Mitchell. "EPR and DRS are critical tools, but true circularity requires rethinking our entire relationship with materials and waste. The goal isn't just better recycling – it's designing waste out of the system entirely."
True circularity requires rethinking our entire relationship with materials and waste. The goal isn't just better recycling – it's designing waste out of the system entirely.
What Businesses Need to Do
Companies affected by EPR regulations should take immediate action:
The transition won't be seamless, but early movers are already finding that circular design can reduce costs, strengthen brand reputation, and open new business opportunities. As the regulatory landscape continues to evolve, the circular economy is shifting from aspiration to commercial reality.
For more information on EPR compliance, visit the UK Government guidance or consult with a registered compliance scheme.
resource.co article ai
How will the government and DMOs address the challenges of including glass in DRS while ensuring a level playing field across the UK?
There's no easy solution to include glass in the DRS while maintaining a level playing field. Potential approaches include a phased introduction of glass, potentially with higher deposits to reflect its logistical challenges. The government and DMOs could incentivise innovation in glass packaging design and subsidise dedicated return points for glass-handling. Exemptions for smaller businesses unable to handle glass might also be necessary. Any successful solution will likely blend several approaches. It must address the differing priorities of devolved administrations, balance environmental benefits with logistical and cost implications, and be supported by robust consumer education campaigns emphasizing the importance of glass recycling.